July 30, 2007 Issue
HEARING
LOSS HELP E-zine
"The premier e-zine for people with hearing loss"
Volume 2, Number 6
July 30, 2007
Publisher: Neil Bauman
neil@hearinglosshelp.com
http://www.hearinglosshelp.com
Copyright Center for Hearing Loss Help 2007
<> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
You are receiving Hearing Loss Help e-zine because you
valued your ears enough to specifically ask for this
subscription, or you are a customer of the Center for
Hearing Loss Help. If you no longer wish to receive
Hearing Loss Help e-zine, just scroll to the bottom where
you can delete yourself from this e-zine mailing list
quickly, easily and automatically.
If you are missing any previous issues, you can read them
in our archives.
<> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
"Hearing loss may change your life,
but your life need not be any less
rewarding and fulfilling
because you have a hearing loss."
— Neil Bauman, Ph.D.
<> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
Please recommend and/or forward this issue of Hearing Loss Help
e-zine to at least one of your hard of hearing friends, or to
anyone you know that is interested in successfully living with
their hearing loss. We just ask that you keep this e-zine intact
and only forward it in its entirety.
==================================================
In this issue
==================================================
1. News Items
2. Beware of (Ototoxic) Drugs That Can Damage Your Ears
3. Answers to Your Questions
4. Subscriber-only Special
5. Coping Strategies
6. Information on Hearing Aids, Cochlear Implants and/or
Assistive Devices
==================================================
1. News Items
==================================================
What's the Best Treatment for Sudden Hearing Loss?—The
Surprising Answer
by Neil Bauman, Ph.D.
Sudden hearing loss is a medical emergency. That is not in doubt.
What is in doubt is how doctors should best treat sudden hearing
loss.
Treatment for sudden hearing loss currently includes steroids,
antiviral medications, vasodilators, hyperbaric oxygen, and to a
lesser extent, vitamins, minerals and herbs, Some ear specialists
choose not to treat Sudden Hearing Loss at all—citing
spontaneous recovery rates of between 32% and 70%. However,
giving steroids such as Prednisone is by far the most popular
treatment.
So what's the problem? The shocking truth is that there is little
scientific evidence that supports the use of Prednisone, or any
other treatment for that matter, according to an analysis of 21
random studies done on Sudden Hearing Loss over the past 40 years
according to researchers Drs. Anne Conlin and Lorne Parnes in
Ontario, Canada.
In the studies they analyzed, the doctors found positive results
reported for systemic steroids (pills), intratympanic steroids
(injected through the eardrum), batroxobin (an anti-clotting
agent), magnesium, vitamin E and hyperbaric oxygen. However, they
also found serious limitations in each study that had a positive
finding, thus throwing these results in doubt.
Drs. Conlin and Parnes wrote: "To our knowledge, no valid
randomized controlled trial exists to determine effective
treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss." In other words,
there is no proof that any treatment really works.
For example, after pooling the data that compared steroids with
placebos, the results showed no difference between treatment
groups, In addition, there was no difference in the results
between people treated with antivirals plus steroids vs. those
treated with placebos plus steroids. Nor was there any difference
in the results between people treated with steroids vs. people
treated with any other active treatment.
The authors conclude, "At present, sudden sensorineural hearing
loss remains a medical emergency without a scientific
understanding of its cause or a rational approach to its
treatment."
Therefore, until studies are done which prove what treatments (if
any) are effective, you may be just as far ahead to do nothing
and let nature take its course. The odds are good that your
hearing will come back—at least partially, but if it doesn't,
the treatments your doctor would prescribe likely wouldn't help
you much either.
The problem is in knowing whether hearing came back because of
the medical treatment, or in spite of it. The tendency is to
think it was because of the treatment, but this apparently is not
a good assumption at all.
However, if you feel you want to take the "shotgun approach" and
try any or all the treatments in hopes that one will work for
you, go right ahead. That is your prerogative. Just don't expect
miracles as there are still far too many unknowns about the
effectiveness of any current treatments for Sudden Hearing Loss.
Extracted from the Archives of Otolaryngology: Head & Neck Surgery
(Vol. 133, No 6, 573-581 and 582-586).
--o--o--o--o--o--o--o--o--o--o--o--
Some Children Are Born with Temporary Deafness
by Neil Bauman, Ph.D.
Strange as it may seem, some children are born deaf, but "regain"
their hearing a few months later without medical intervention
according to Dr. Joseph Attias at the University of Haifa in
Israel.
Amir Gilat, in his report "Some children are born with 'temporary
deafness' and do not require cochlear implant," explains:
"There are two causes of congenital deafness among children. One
is the lack of hair cells that activate the auditory nerve. The
second cause is a malfunction of the nerve itself. A child may be
born with what appears to be a normal inner ear, but the hair
cells do not 'communicate' with the auditory nerve and the child
cannot hear."
Typically, doctors recommend that deaf children receive a
cochlear implant as soon as possible so language develops
normally. However, for those children with this kind of
"temporary deafness" a cochlear implant is totally unnecessary as
their hearing may return to normal over a period of 17 months or
so.
According to Dr. Attias, "Because children typically go through a
series of tests and evaluations by different doctors, a process
that often takes months, there are cases of children who were
initially referred for a cochlear implant who didn't have it done
because their hearing comes back." For example, Dr Attias said,
"I called parents and found seven cases of children who were
diagnosed as deaf, did not have a cochlear implant, and began to
hear."
Gilat continues, "Dr. Attias then found five more children who
had been referred to him for pre-operative testing who had begun
to hear in the meantime. By the end of his clinical research, he
had identified a 'window of opportunity' of 17 months during
which deaf children may begin to hear."
Dr. Attias cautions, "A child whose deafness is caused by a
malfunctioning connection between hair cells and the auditory
nerve should NOT have a cochlear implant in the first 17 months
of life. Research results show the possibility that at least some
of these children undergo the procedure for nothing."
Since a cochlear implant does not give normal hearing, such
children would actually end up with worse hearing than if they
had not received a cochlear implant. Therefore, the trend to
implant children as young as 8 months or so would not give enough
time to evaluate whether their hearing might "come back" on its
own.
Interestingly enough, some children only develop partial hearing
rather than normal hearing. Since they are hard of hearing, these
children can be fitted with hearing aids rather than having a
cochlear implant. Gilat concludes, "Dr. Attias is now researching
'temporary deafness' among young children, looking to find a way
to identify those who will recover and those who will not."
As a result of this research, if you have a child that is
diagnosed as deaf at birth, you might want to have hearing
testing done for a number of months to see whether any hearing is
showing up before you opt for a cochlear implant for your child.
Reference: Eurekalert May 16, 2007
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-05/uoh-sca051607.php.
--o--o--o--o--o--o--o--o--o--o--o--
Diabetes and Hearing Loss
by Neil Bauman, Ph.D.
If you have diabetes, you are twice as likely to develop hearing
loss as you would be if you'd not had diabetes according to
Catherine Cowie, PhD, the director of the diabetes epidemiology
program at the National Institutes of Health.
Hearing loss from diabetes affects all speech frequencies, but is
more pronounced in the higher frequencies. For example, in her
study, Dr. Cowie found that 32% of diabetics had low-frequency
hearing loss (15% for non-diabetics), while 57% of diabetics had
high-frequency hearing loss (36% for non-diabetics).
This increased hearing loss could be the result of either changes
in the circulatory system resulting in less blood flow to the
peripheral blood vessels (which includes the tiny arteries in the
inner ear), or changes in the nervous system—typically death to
some nerve endings (which also includes the hair cells
[technically the auditory nerve endings] in the inner ear).
Therefore, if you have diabetes, it sure wouldn't hurt to have
regular audiograms done every year or two so you can keep tabs on
your hearing. If you are losing significant hearing, then you can
get hearing aids before hearing loss sneaks up on you and
negatively impacts your life.
(Extracted from: Diabetes and Hearing Impairment: Audiometric
Evidence From the National Health and Nutrition Examination
Survey, 1999-2004. Abstract 991-P)
--o--o--o--o--o--o--o--o--o--o--o--
Hearing Loss and Air Bags
by Neil Bauman, Ph.D.
Air bags save lives—and for that we are definitely thankful.
They also destroy hearing—and that is not so nice. Here is
Lisa's story.
"Last week I was involved in what should have been a minor car
accident. I wasn't paying attention and 'gently' hit the car in
front of me stopped for a light.
What happened next was terrifying. The inside of the car seemed
to explode in a deafening roar. I had an unimaginable pain in
both ears and considerable bleeding from my ear canals. I also
had a very loud ringing and was virtually deaf.
I was taken to the hospital where it was quickly determined that
my eardrums had ruptured. I was referred to an ENT who said they
should heal in 2-3 weeks, but possibly with scar tissue that
would affect my ability to hear low sounds. As for the ringing,
he said that could be permanent. He also said I had suffered
inner ear damage that would affect my high-frequency hearing,
although he said it was hard to tell how much. He concluded by
saying I would need to face life 'hearing impaired' and may need
to look at hearing aids.
I have always protected my hearing and never would have thought
about going to loud concerts or auto races without effective
noise protection. I’m only 22 and I can barely hear conversation
in a quiet room. With background noise, I am almost deaf."(1)
Lisa is not alone. Many other people have also experienced
tinnitus and/or hearing loss when air bags deploy. In fact, the
results of researcher Richard Price's studies indicates that a
whopping 17% of the people exposed to deployed air bags will
experience permanent hearing loss. That's a lot of people—almost
1 in every 5 people exposed to air bags going off!
Here's another surprising discovery. His data also shows that
contrary to what experts previously thought, airbag deployment is
more damaging to our ears when we have the windows rolled down.
"This is because the higher pressure generated in the closed
cabin actually prevents greater damage to the ear. The pressure
causes a displacement in the middle ear that stiffens the stapes,
a small bone outside the inner ear. This stiffening limits the
transmission of energy to the inner ear, where hearing damage
takes place. In airbag experiments where the cabin is completely
sealed and pressure is even higher, hearing damage is reduced
even further."
Incidentally, Price's study only included cars sold in the United
States. American cars have larger, more powerful airbags than
cars sold in Europe. Hence, cars with smaller airbags sold in
other parts of the world would likely pose less auditory danger
when tested under identical circumstances."(2)
The moral of the story, and another good reason to drive
carefully and avoid accidents, especially "fender benders," is
that an air bag going off causes just as much damage to your ears
whether you are going 15 miles an hour (and serious injuries are
unlikely) or 80 miles an hour (where hearing loss may be the
least of your worries)!
(1) Hearing Loss Web Forum: Issues: Air bags ruined my life.
Accessed online at
www.hearinglossweb.com/discus/messages/12/733.html?FridayJune1020050444pm
(2) As reported in The Hearing Review
http://www.hearingreview.com/issues/articles/2007-07_10.asp taken
from: Price Richard. Intense impulse noise: hearing
conservation's poison gas. Paper presented at: Annual Conference
of the National Hearing Conservation Association, February 16,
2007.
**************************************************
Having trouble hearing your iPod (or MP3 player) in true stereo?
If you wear hearing aids that have t-coils in them, the dual
Music-Links will let you hear beautiful, clear, true-stereo sounds
in both ears!
Click here to learn more.
**************************************************
==================================================
2. Beware of (Ototoxic) Drugs That Can Damage Your Ears
==================================================
Gabapentin Does Not Work for Tinnitus
by Neil Bauman, Ph.D.
I recently received a phone call from a man who wanted to know
about the ototoxicity of Gabapentin, because his doctor had
prescribed it for his tinnitus.
I explained to him that researchers have now concluded that
Gabapentin (Neurontin) is no more effective than a placebo for
tinnitus relief (reported in the April issue of the Archives of
Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery 2007; 133:390-397).
Why should we not be surprised? After all, Gabapentin causes
tinnitus in a good number of the people that take it. In fact,
Gabapentin is quite ototoxic. According to the PDR, it can cause
hearing loss, hyperacusis, tinnitus, ataxia, dizziness, vertigo,
and ear pain among other things.
This is not the kind of drug you want doctors using to treat your
ears, or anywhere in your body for that matter!
Rather interestingly, this above article concludes with the
statement, "To date, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
has not approved any drug for the treatment of tinnitus." So if
any doctor prescribes any drug for your tinnitus, know that this
use is not approved by the FDA for tinnitus. It's that simple.
Since there are more than 450 drugs known to cause tinnitus, the
chances of researchers finding one that stops tinnitus seems
pretty slim!
To be safe, you always need to check out the ototoxic side
effects of any drugs before you take them. One way to do this is
to check them out in "Ototoxic
Drugs Exposed". This book contains
information on the ototoxicity of 763 drugs known to damage ears
(including the 450 known to cause tinnitus). For your copy, click on the above
link now.
**************************************************
Having trouble hearing on your cell phone because of lack of
volume or interference?
If you wear hearing aids that have t-coils in them, try the dual
T-Links and hear beautiful, clear, interference-free sounds in both
ears!
Click here to learn more.
**************************************************
==================================================
3. Answers to Your Questions
==================================================
If you have a question, or if something has been puzzling you
concerning your ears, email it to
mailto:neil@hearinglosshelp.com
and put "e-zine question" as the subject. Suitable questions will
be answered here.
______________
Sympathetic Hearing Loss
by Neil Bauman, Ph.D.
A man wrote: "Your site (http://www.hearinglosshelp.com)
is extremely informative. I do have a
question. I am a member of ANA (Acoustic Neuroma Association)
and there was one member a long time ago that experienced
sympathetic hearing loss following AN surgery. Recently, there are
others reporting AIED (Autoimmune Inner Ear Disease) following
radiation and just watching the tumor. I was wondering if treatments
for acoustic neuroma cause AIED, or is it that some people are just
destined to acquire this no matter what the situation? Is sympathetic
hearing loss and AIED the same thing?"
Good questions. Strange as it may seem, sympathetic hearing loss
is where you lose hearing in one ear from some cause, then later,
your remaining ear loses its hearing—seemingly in sympathy for
the first ear.
Now to answer your questions. Is sympathetic hearing loss and
AIED the same thing? The answer is technically no—although they
may be related at times. This is because if you had AIED in one
ear, it could result in sympathetic hearing loss in the other ear
according to one theory. Here's how they think it works.
Some doctors think that the ear may be only partially "immune
privileged." This means that your body may not know about all the
antigens in your inner ear. Therefore, when/if they are released
into the rest of your body (perhaps following surgery or an
infection) your body may think they are foreign agents, and thus
wrongly attack these "foreign" antigens. The result could be
hearing loss in your other, formerly good, ear.
Dr. Timothy Hain observed that some patients treated for acoustic
neuromas have delayed sympathetic hearing loss in the opposite
ear. This can also happen if you are treated for Meniere's
Disease in one ear, or if you are treated with radiation for a
tumor in one ear.
Thus, there does seem to be some credibility to this theory, but
it certainly isn't the case in everybody with AIED. Dr. Hain
suspects sympathetic hearing only occurs in about 1% of the
patients in which inner ear antigens are released into the rest
of the body following surgery, or other treatments. (1)
(1) Hain, Timothy. Autoimmune Inner Ear Disease (AIED)
http://www.dizziness-and-balance.com/disorders/autoimmune/aied.html
==================================================
4. Subscriber-only Special
==================================================
As is our custom, with each issue of Hearing Loss Help eZine we
bring you a subscriber-only special that is only available to
you, our loyal subscribers.
This issue's special is for the eBook version of our book on
Musical Ear Syndrome called "Phantom Voices, Ethereal Music &
Other Spooky Sounds". When hard of hearing people begin hearing
phantom voices or music, they immediately worry they are going
crazy. After all, only people with schizophrenia and other mental
illnesses hear such sounds, right? Wrong! The truth is, thousands
of sane, hard of hearing people experience the spooky phantom
voices, music and other sounds associated with Musical Ear
syndrome. Learn what these sounds are, what causes them, what you
can do to alleviate or eliminate them and how you can regain your
peace of mind (176 pages).
This eBook normally sells for $16.99. If you always wanted this
book, now is your chance to save 30% off the already low eBook
price. For a limited time you can have it for just $11.97.
Furthermore, for our overseas friends, because it is an eBook,
there is no shipping charge and you can download it immediately—
no waiting time. (Note: the eBook version is identical in content
to the printed edition.)
Order it now while you are thinking about it because this special
will only be available until August 21st at midnight.
To get this special price, you must click on the below link. Do
not order from the regular links on the web site or elsewhere or
you will be charged the regular price.
To purchase this eBook edition of
Phantom
Voices, Ethereal Music
& Other Spooky Sounds at this special subscriber price of just
$11.97, click on the above link now.
**************************************************
If you are receiving this issue of Hearing Loss Help e-zine as a
forward, you can sign up for your own subscription at
http://www.hearinglosshelp.com, or
send a blank email to
hearingloss-158260@autocontactor.com. Hearing Loss Help e-
zine doesn't cost you a cent!
**************************************************
==================================================
5. Coping Strategies
==================================================
When Your Piano Sounds Bad
by Neil Bauman, Ph.D.
A man explained, "I have felt very fortunate during my 81 years
in having the ability to play the piano "by ear." Recently, I
found that the notes starting with the "F" in the octave above
the middle "C" octave sounded bad enough to me to cause me to
stop enjoying the playing. Having the piano tuned produced
minimum improvement as did removing my hearing aids, so it must
be my hearing. Do you have any comments or is there any
information that might explain or improve this situation?"
Playing music by ear is not something I could ever do because of
my hearing loss—nor could my late mother (hard of hearing all
her life also—but who still taught piano to a few students. Nor
can my hard of hearing daughter play by ear. However, my other
daughter with normal hearing seems to effortlessly play by ear.
It's just not fair, is it?
I'm not surprised that you are having trouble hearing the higher
notes on the piano, or that they now sound distorted to you.
Typically, hearing loss begins in the very high frequencies and
works its way down the scale. Thus, as a rule, you hear the
lower-frequency notes just fine, but as your hearing
deteriorates, somewhere on the right side of keyboard an octave
or more above middle C you find that the notes just don't sound
the same any more.
My first suggestion is to go to an audiologist and get your
hearing checked. Then have your audiologist determine whether
your current hearing aids are giving you the needed amplification
in the frequencies you are having difficulty hearing properly. It
may be that all you need is to have your hearing aids re-adjusted
for your current hearing loss.
If your old hearing aids aren't strong enough now, you may need
new, more powerful hearing aids.
However, if your hearing is basically now non-existent in the
high frequencies, amplifying sounds you can't hear won't help you
(and will just cause your hearing aids to squeal—which you won't
hear either). If this is the case, there isn't much you can do,
except to transpose the pieces you like to a lower key where you
still hear reasonably well.
It's one of the "joys" of having a hearing loss. You certainly
are not alone. Others have similar problems. For example, my wife
hears different keys in each ear so doesn't know which ear to
pitch her voice to.
==================================================
6. Information on Hearing Aids, Cochlear Implants
and/or Assistive Devices
==================================================
Adjusting T-Coil Volume and Real Ear Testing on New Hearing
Aids
by Neil Bauman, Ph.D.
A man had trouble hearing using his hearing aid's t-coils. I
suggested that he go to his audiologist and have the volume set
to a level equal to that of his hearing aids' microphones. When
that is done, switching from microphone mode to t-coil mode would
produce sounds at the same volume.
He wrote, "I made an appointment with my audiologist to have the
t-coil volume increased. Well, my audiologist did her computer
magic and VIOLA!!! In fact, she also increased the volume on my
right aid. Now, when I use the telephone, I actually have to turn
down the volume of the phone a little bit!
To test my t-coils for proper volume and balance, my audiologist
took me into her waiting room which is "looped" and I was able to
tell her which aid needed to be adjusted up or down. As well as
the loop being a convenience to waiting patients, it is also a
"tool" she is able to use in cases like mine. I was beyond
impressed at the magic she was able to perform. However, she
cautioned me that not all hearing aid t-coils volume can be
adjusted. She listed some factors such as must be programmable,
digital, certain manufacturers, etc."
The good news is that this audiologist was able to set the t-
coils to the proper volume for this man. Also, I heartily commend
her for looping her waiting room.
The bad news is that obviously she didn't set up the t-coils
properly in the first place when she sold the hearing aids to
this man. Why ever not? This is just plain shoddy fitting
practice, and shows disrespect towards hard of hearing people. We
deserve better. I'm not the only one who thinks this.
For example, in response, Audiologist Brad Ingrao, Au.D. (an
audiologist I truly respect for his knowledge of what hard of
hearing people really need) wrote: "I'm happy to hear that your
audiologist was able to solve your problem, however as an
audiologist, I feel the need to dispel the concept that what she
did was magic. What she did was called verification. I am glad to
hear that she did it, but the fact of the matter is that, it should have been
done initially!
Verifying that hearing aids are performing to the needs of the
patient in all modes should be standard practice. Unfortunately,
too many audiologists and dispensers trust the computer screens
created by manufacturers and then 'fine tune' until they
(hopefully) get it right.
There are several studies demonstrating that the computer screens
are wrong. An even more disturbing fact is that even though we
all know that independent verification (i.e. 'Real Ear' testing)
improves the accuracy of fittings, less than 20% of hearing care
professionals do it on a regular basis."
Therefore before you go to an audiologist or hearing aid
dispenser, ask them two simple questions.
1. Do you do real ear testing to verify your set up of each
person's hearing aids?
2. Do you have a loop system (either a room loop or something as
simple as a PockeTalker and neckloop) that you use to check your
set up of the t-coils on each person's hearing aids?
If the answer to either of these questions is "no," run the other
way. Keep looking for a professional that does those two simple
things. Just doing those two simple things can make all the
difference to how well you like your new hearing aids.
<> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
HEARING LOSS HELP E-zine
Neil Bauman, Publisher
Center for Hearing Loss Help
49 Piston Court
Stewartstown, PA 17363 USA
Phone: (717) 993-8555
Fax (717) 993-6661
http://www.hearinglosshelp.com
neil@hearinglosshelp.com
<> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
|